What honest and kind eyes this obviously wonderful person has. After all, he certainly cannot lie! Alas, the opposite is often the case. A person can be deceived and cheated even when visiting such a cultural institution as a store. And right in the holy of holies - at the checkout. Even a nice cashier girl or a seemingly intelligent guy can turn out to be scammers. Therefore, you should always remain vigilant.
1. "Trust but check"
The simplest, proven over the years, way to deceive citizens at the checkout is a banal "cheating". The cashier, as if by accident, wrongly gives less change. And then everything is like in a well-known joke: I live on these 2%. Therefore, change should always be counted. However, if the money was given less than necessary, you should not immediately rush to the person with accusations. It is almost impossible to prove the intention of such actions, in addition, it may be that a person really made a mistake in good faith.
2. "Superfluous Goods"
In fact, this method of deception is a kind of "cheating". It's just that the cashier punches a person in a different way - punches him extra goods. As in the first case, it is not worth immediately attacking a public trade worker with abuse. You still can't prove cheating. All that remains to be done is to exercise heightened vigilance. In such a situation, you should point out the mistake to the cashier, request a cancellation and a refund.
>>>>Ideas for life | NOVATE.RU<<<<
3. Operation "Barcode"
Another popular way to "calculate". It differs in that a citizen is punched a similar, but more expensive product. In order not to get into the Prussian, you should carefully check the final check and at least approximately remember the prices of products. Unlike the two methods of deception described above, this method is already a completely obvious “setup”. You still don’t need to scandalize, but you can already call the police and the store administration.
In continuation of the topic, read about 10 car models, which hijackers are least interested in.
Source: https://novate.ru/blogs/200222/62196/