In the vastness of the domestic segment of the Internet, a lot of materials are devoted to the rights of motorists. In particular, it was repeatedly said that the driver is not at all obliged to follow the traffic police inspector in the car at the first suggestion. However, each rule has its exceptions. Surely, many would be interested to know if there are such situations, in principle, when, from the point of view of the law, the “proposal” becomes the category of “requirements”.
Every motorist with experience has at least once faced a situation when a traffic police inspector, when checking documents, asks to go with him to a patrol car. The driver is faced with a choice - to agree to the offer or refuse (or at least try to find out why he should do this). It is quite obvious that among the entire mass of inspectors there are also not very decent citizens. It is possible that in such a cunning way an unscrupulous policeman wants to hide from prying eyes in order to talk to the driver "in essence" or even put some pressure on him.
However, in fact, in the overwhelming majority of cases, the adage that "fear has large eyes" is applicable. The fact is that in fact the requirement for the driver to proceed to the traffic police car is quite legal. This is because the motorist is obliged to be present during a number of official actions.
READ ALSO:What's the silver tip for the bullets (not for werewolves)
IT IS INTERESTING:There is no place for old people: why the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia does not give up the obsolete PM
In addition, the motorist is obliged to get into the inspector's car if the latter has reason to believe that the driver stopped by him is in a state of alcohol (or drug) intoxication. The driver is obliged to follow the same requirement if, in the opinion of the inspector, he is in a state of serious illness and is not entitled to drive a vehicle in such a state.
>>>>Ideas for life | NOVATE.RU<<<
Finally, the motorist is obliged to leave the car and follow the inspector if he asks for his help in some official business. If the motorist refuses the policeman in all of the above cases, then from the point of view of the law, his behavior can be interpreted as disobedience to the legal requirements of a representative of law enforcement organs.
If you want to know even more interesting things, you should definitely read about why in Russia began to massively cancel the fine from video cameras.
A source: https://novate.ru/blogs/280120/53236/