The theme of the knights and the Middle Ages, perhaps, remains one of the most popular in the film industry. But anyone who is a historian, or at least is interested in the past, will immediately say that the image of the medieval reality in films and TV series is such that it suggests that the writers did not at all delve into the era about which wrote. This is especially true of the image of military operations: either on the battlefield, a duel suddenly occurs, then European fighters fight with Asian weapons.
1. Fire! Command before the start of the battle
One of the strangest blunders that historians note in films about Medieval battles is the command "Fire!", Which was addressed to the squads of archers. There is no logic in this exclamation, because the only adequate condition under which it is appropriate is the use of firearms. In addition, with the advent of the latter, the bow was almost immediately ousted from the battlefield, and before that "Fire!" no one, of course, shouted.
2. Mongolian bows from European archers
Many people pay attention to this inaccuracy, but the reason for it remains unclear to most of us. So, in films and TV series you can often see a medieval knight or just archers who famously shoot from... curved Mongolian bows.
In fairness, it should be clarified that in the same mistake with the wrong weapon, you can find another one: real European knights were very cool about the bow, and they did not use it everywhere. As for the choice of the Mongolian bow instead of the straight one, which is true in history, here the aesthetic side plays a decisive role. The bows of Asian nomads are simply prettier than their Western counterparts and, besides, they are not so cumbersome and long, and therefore look better in the frame.
3. Duels between warriors during battle scenes
Almost always, in cinematic battle scenes, you can observe how the characters seem to break on command. into pairs and fight as if this is not a large-scale battle between huge troops, but a chamber duel on clearing. Such a scenario and directorial move is quite understandable - it focuses better on individual characters or certain events taking place in the heat of battle.
But the medieval commanders-in-chief, if they saw a modern film about their time, categorically would not accept such a tactic, because in real life it would be destructive, and in principle unlikely. In fact, a thousand years ago, during the offensive, the most important rule was to hold the formation and prevent the enemy from breaking through. Considering the peculiarities of military affairs and the development of weapons, in those days such tactics were the most effective, in contrast to a series of duel battles.
4. Archer vs swordsman
Sometimes in the cinema about medieval events you can find a very original scene when the knights collide with the larvae, and the latter famously take out their swords and tie
long beautiful battle. In reality, such a development of events would be simply impossible: the whole point is that an experienced swordsman in close combat will defeat archer in a few blows, and archers are professionals in shooting, and a seasoned knight with a sword is simply given the proper selection incapable.
5. Weapon not for the era
Another typical blooper from filmmakers is the use of weapons that do not belong to the period of history in which the plot unfolds. A striking example of this discrepancy is the two-handed sword - it can be seen in most films about medieval wars or just the events of that time. Of course, the directors can be understood, because this weapon impresses the viewer with its size, power and beauty.
But in reality, most of the plots would do without it: the thing is that the two-handed sword became very popular only in the late Middle Ages, that is, in the 14th century. And he got such an opportunity not because of their convenience, but because the gunsmiths needed something to respond to the strengthening of the armor.
6. Fire arrow shooting
In many films, fire arrows are used in almost every battle. Moreover, both infantrymen and horsemen are subjected to shelling by them. But in reality, there is simply no sense in such tactics.
Any military historian will say that fire arrows have a rather narrow specialization - they set fire to wooden structures or the fleet, as well as siege weapons. Against cavalry, and even more so, infantry, they will be absolutely useless.
READ ALSO: Why Japan made public toilets on city streets transparent
IT IS INTERESTING: What American tractors look like inside, which will be better than many apartments
7. An incredibly fleeting siege
In the movie, the siege of a medieval fortification goes astonishingly fast, as does the assault after. Actually, the image of this process requires rather the need for an impressive picture and the limited timing of the picture.
In the Middle Ages, the siege of the fortress was a common move during the war. But it usually lasted for months, and sometimes for years. If you try to use "cinematic" tactics, then the attackers will not only not take the fortification, but will also lose a huge number of people.
>>>>Ideas for life | NOVATE.RU<<<<
8. Battle to the last soldier
In all serious and decisive battles in the cinema, the troops fight to the last soldier. So the plot is filled with pathos and drama. But in reality, the military leaders proceeded from pragmatic considerations, and therefore such tactics would never have been used.
It is important to understand that a battle, as they say, to a victorious one, especially with the threat of losing the entire army, is the height of ill-considered and irresponsible. In reality, the commander-in-chief will never allow his army to be annihilated just to win one battle. Therefore, such battles often ended with a retreat or the surrender of fortifications, and no more than half of the army died.
In addition to the topic: Glass tricks and a silent muffler: 16 movie stamps that cannot be repeated in real life
A source: https://novate.ru/blogs/210920/56075/