Why did the Vikings use axes rather than swords in battle?

  • Sep 05, 2021
click fraud protection
A battle ax is not necessarily a huge tool that can only be mastered by a person of remarkable strength. In fact, the history of the development of this type of cold weapon is long-standing, and its evolution was rather slow. It is to her that you should turn to in order to understand why the Vikings preferred axes.
A battle ax is not necessarily a huge tool that can only be mastered by a person of remarkable strength. In fact, the history of the development of this type of cold weapon is long-standing, and its evolution was rather slow. It is to her that you should turn to in order to understand why the Vikings preferred axes.
A battle ax is not necessarily a huge tool that can only be mastered by a person of remarkable strength. In fact, the history of the development of this type of cold weapon is long-standing, and its evolution was rather slow. It is to her that you should turn to in order to understand why the Vikings preferred axes.

1. Francis and their successors

In the early European Middle Ages, the light axes of Francis were popular / Photo: yandex.ru
In the early European Middle Ages, the light axes of Francis were popular / Photo: yandex.ru
In the early European Middle Ages, the light axes of Francis were popular / Photo: yandex.ru
Francis were only suitable for close combat / Photo: Pinterest
Francis were only suitable for close combat / Photo: Pinterest
Francis were only suitable for close combat / Photo: Pinterest

In the early European Middle Ages, the most popular were the Francis. These light hatchets gradually began to be used not only in close combat, but also for throwing. They stopped using them even before the time of the Vikings came.

instagram viewer

The ax shaft of the post-Frankish era was extended to 50-60 centimeters / Photo: info-rm.com
The ax shaft of the post-Frankish era was extended to 50-60 centimeters / Photo: info-rm.com

During the post-Frankish era, the axes became somewhat different. They had a shaft of 50 to 60 centimeters. Hatchets had a number of positive properties. They were lightweight, perfectly balanced. They were used to cut down in battle in a fight face to face, and fenced. Initially, the cutting surface was up to ten centimeters. Gradually it became wider.

2. Scandinavian or Danish Viking ax

The Scandinavian Viking ax had a length of one and a half meters, the cutting surface expanded from the base to the blade / Photo: healiosproducts.com
The Scandinavian Viking ax had a length of one and a half meters, the cutting surface expanded from the base to the blade / Photo: healiosproducts.com

Its shaft was up to 1.5 meters, and the cutting surface was narrow at the base, and closer to the blade it expanded. Such indicators allowed to reduce weight and improve the speed of use and overall penetrating power.

The shape of the hatchet was not chosen by chance, thanks to it the Viking could pull the enemy's shield towards himself in order to strike / Photo: artstation.com
The shape of the hatchet was not chosen by chance, thanks to it the Viking could pull the enemy's shield towards himself in order to strike / Photo: artstation.com

It was no coincidence that the shape was rounded. Thanks to this, the Viking had the opportunity to pull the enemy's shield towards himself, and with a sharp part to strike an accurate blow to the head. The two-handed Scandinavian ax, unlike all available swords, gave a long range. But it was slower than the blade. However, there were more positive aspects. Thanks to him, the Vikings successfully repulsed the attacks of the horsemen. They were applied in practice by the troops of many states.

3. Why did the Scandinavians prefer hatchets?

Swords were expensive and status weapons, they could be afforded by Yarls, kings and high-ranking vigilantes / Photo: alev-biz.livejournal.com
Swords were expensive and status weapons, they could be afforded by Yarls, kings and high-ranking vigilantes / Photo: alev-biz.livejournal.com

At that time, swords were very expensive and high-status. They were owned by high-ranking vigilantes. It could have been with a jarl or a king, but ordinary people who were still farming yesterday could not afford a sword. He could get it only after many campaigns, and successful ones. But the simple peasant had other preferences, for example, to acquire a house, a farm, and to get married.

It didn't take much metal to make an ax, so it was much more affordable than a sword / Photo: youtesla.ru
It didn't take much metal to make an ax, so it was much more affordable than a sword / Photo: youtesla.ru

An ax for battle could be made by his own master, since he did not need a lot of metal for it, and the ax handle could always be changed. Every Scandinavian knew how to handle such a weapon, so there were no problems here.

>>>>Ideas for life | NOVATE.RU<<<<

Combat tactics and a long ax shaft gave the Vikings an advantage over enemies / Photo: imhotour.ru
Combat tactics and a long ax shaft gave the Vikings an advantage over enemies / Photo: imhotour.ru

The ax was also a versatile weapon. An enemy with a sword could hardly come close to the Viking. Combat tactics, a wall of shields, and long weapons gave the Vikings significant advantages.

Continuing the topic read,
why Viking shields were actually fragile and easily broken.
A source:
https://novate.ru/blogs/210321/58271/

IT IS INTERESTING:

1. "Fu, barbarism": how the ancient Romans dressed in cold weather

2. Why do American men wear a T-shirt under their shirt?

3. Berezin machine gun: famous and unknown at the same time